If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
@they now have

Poster Message:
The incoming MSU class of 2011 is one of the most academically talented and leadership driven classes the school has had in quite a while. Same to be said for the incoming transfers - some of whom I know personally! So, I cannot understand why Chi O would PURPOSE to under-bid any classification of student?? That just makes no sense to me. There were plenty of outstanding, beautiful, and overly-qualified women who pledged other groups - why didn't Chi O pledge some of them?? If they're not careful they'll wind up doing COB with the under-performing groups for a spring pledge class. Just not sure I see the wisdom in that decision, given the strength of the PNM pool this year...? I mean, you say quality over quantity "as far as non-freshmen are concerned." Why single out that group? If Chi O is choosing not to make quota with one classification of student, then why didn't they choose to do the same thing with freshmen? Just doesn't add up.