If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
question

Poster Message:
Ok, so your premise is laudable. I fully admit that. But you haven't answered the question of how your national organization is trying to reduce quota. If it isn't by encouraging women to drop out of recruitment, then how, exactly? It's all well and good to say that classes are too large. But "stop" says that her house has been instructed to keep their class under 100 "at all costs," and closer to 75. I want to know how they are planning to do that. We can't magically make a 16th house appear this year. So how does stop's national organization propose that they make quota close to 75, without encouraging qualified women to drop? It's not about handing out a trophy. What you are suggesting is that if there are 90 women who meet your standards of membership and would make good members of your sorority, that you should in some way deny membership to 15 of them just so that you can keep class size down. I honestly don't know how you will accomplish that in the present unless you are encouraging women to drop out of recruitment so that there is a smaller pool of candidates. That is wrong. That is contrary to NPC ideals. The first purpose of RFM, per NPC, is: "Maximize the number of potential new members (PNMs) who ultimately affiliate with a sorority through recruitment."