If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
queen b

Poster Message:
I think it's easier to separate sororities into two groups: professional-based sororities and social based sororities. It seems like the sororities here have become too extreme in either direction. The top three houses have a good mix of both styles (chi o, tri delt, pi phi) while other houses get girls based on their house culture. Not saying one is better than the other, but to group alpha phi and ADPi together seems kind of weird, even if they are pretty similar in the ranks. For what it's worth, this site is swarmed with girls from the second group, which makes sense since they're the type of girls that care about rankings and placing in stuff. Social (in order) Tri Delt Pi Phi Alpha Phi G Phi DG Zeta Professional (in order) Chi O Kappa Theta ADPi AXO KD In my observation, if a girl doesn't get a top three house, they mainly either look for professional-based houses (grades, homecoming/greek week, campus involvement) or social-based houses (looks, what fraternities they socialize with, etc) and then go down the list as they get cut. Phi mu and tri sig are harder to stereotype since they tend to get a more random group. Sigma Kappa is new, and could go either way. Just my observations!