If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Rushing this fall

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />Top Fraternity vs. top sorority definition<br /><br /> Poster Message:
Just an observation I had. When people talk about top fraternities it's usually based on social status, looks, popularity, parties/tailgates, and grades to a much lesser degree. As opposed to what a lot of people say about sororities being top based on grades and being genuine. Why is social status less of a factor? Just wondering why the definitions seem to be so different when people have these discussions on here and in real life. Obviously I know it's apples and oranges, and maybe I'm talking to the wrong people. It just seems like there are 3 top fraternities based on xyz criteria and then sororities are judged on completely different factors. Why is that?