If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Molly Jane

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />tiers: reality vs personal opinion <br /><br /> Poster Message:
Reality of the tiers at Mizzou that are most widely agreed upon, there may be some discrepancies: Top: Pi Phi, Chi-O, Delta Upper middle: Theta, Kappa, GPhi, ADPi Middle: AXO, APhi, DG, KD, Zeta Bottom: Phi Mu, Sigma, SK Now my personal opinion of what tiers should be based on what I look for in a house. Top: Chi-O, Theta, Kappa, Pi Phi, Delta Upper Middle: ADPi, APhi, AXO Middle: KD, GPhi, SK, Phi Mu Bottom: Sigma, Zeta, DG I personally value well roundedness as opposed to looks and the top five I listed have the best mix of involvement, grades, not so much looks but the girls aren't all dogs. Upper middle are houses that are only one thing away from being top, ADPi needs an attitude adjustment, APhi just need to fix grades, AXO needs cuter girls. Middle are houses that I think are not the worst but not the best, need a few areas to improve or are houses that have been improving, like Phi Mu. Bottom are houses I'd never join because their values don't align with mine, I don't get along with the girls and I don't think I'd mesh well. I feel like everyone knows the REAL tiers, but I'm interest if anybody's personal tiers stray from the normal tiers like mine do. I know GPhi is considered a top house but I wasn't comfortable there. Likewise, most girls think DG or Zeta are better than Phi Mu but I'd rather be a Phi Mu than a Zeta or DG. Try and be nice. This is just to see how everyones opinions differ. I'm just curious.