If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Another

Poster Message:
Another post by the anti-Aphi jealous stalker to craft an analysis that suits their anti-Aphi bias: 1) Selected only one semester instead of an entire academic year. It would be more correct to use also Spring to Fall retention. And even more correct to average several years. 2) A sample size of one semester is too small for any statistical analysis. 3) An analysis of social organizations with no social measurement included. 4) Without social measurement and equal weight given to the categories selected. i.e. gpa = philantrophy $ = a calculated retention rate. These are not all equal in weight. 5) No measurement of relative recruitment strength. 6) No measurement of the size of the groups is included in this analysis which is probably the most important indicator and should receive an overweight in any combined average. for example: size = 30%, social measurement of a social org. = 30%, gpa = 10%, retention = 10%, recruitment strength = 10%, ....etc. 7) Including SK in any analysis is unfair at this point. 8) National sorority strength might be considered as a small percentage as these memberships are for life and only 4 of those years are spent in college. Maybe at 5%. The above person has a vendetta against APhi and routinely creates biased, statistically unsound analysis. Sad. I don't know what APhi did to you (dropped you back in 1990?) but really, your entire analysis is mostly erroneous because these are social orgs and you have not considered their relative social strength at bama. All this work to hand craft an analysis to make one group look as bad as possible. Maybe spend this effort to improve and/or refine the group you did join?