If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
to i agree

Poster Message:
i think history does play a huge part in who is considered "top tier", and that's fine. axo and xo might be just as "good" (whatever is included - involvement, social, respect, looks, leadership, being well liked, whatever) as the other four, but while they have always been (since at least the 90's) ahead of the "lower tier", they have also been just below the top four. a lot of people think that they are "just as good" or "better" than some of the top four, but tradition does play a very strong role in the consideration, and is what is keeping them from being in the unquestioned top... not saying they won't get there but to some people, there is a valid argument that they just aren't quite there yet, even if it is because of that. and as someone pointed out before, "tradition" means being traditionally strong, not just having a long history here at usc. chi o has been around forever at usc, while axo is actually the newest (unless there are others that didn't "pan out" that i don't know about - definitely possible) since the new wave of sororities having come in the 80's - but dz and kappa have also been around forever and aren't even in the top tier question.