If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Don't Waste Your Time

Poster Message:
trying to figure out who the new colony will be if/when A&M opens up for extension. You never know who will submit a packet, and you never know who will be invited to present until it happens. Everyone assumed GPM or SK would be invited to present at Tech b/c of their history. They may or may not have even submitted a packet last fall. Once the invitations to present went out to AXiD, DZ, and PM, it was anyone's game. It doesn't matter who has a history on campus unless it's recent & there's a lingering bad feeling about them. It doesn't matter who is the strongest at UT/Tech/etc. or the conference. What matters is who the women on the selection committee have the most emotional response to during the review process, plain and simple. Anyone invited to present will already have the national resources to make the new colony/chapter successful (they wouldn't dip their toe in if their national HQ hadn't already done the analysis), so the committee will want to know exactly what the plan is, and probably consider the recent track record of new colonies at other schools similar to A&M. Name recognition will matter, but won't be the be-all-end-all (though you'll never see the lesser known NPCs like ASA, AST, Phi Sigma Sigma, Theta Phi Alpha, or the like at A&M, b/c they are virtually unheard of in the state). Anyway, it's all fine and good to speculate, but based on what Tech experienced last fall, there's just no telling who will be picked.