If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
So

Poster Message:
1. Then I'm assuming you made a mistake when you wrote "what's the University going to benefit from sponsoring a sorority row on campus." On campus. That's the opposite of privately owned, just so you know. 2. It doesn't matter if Alabama rebuilds on old land. They still have to acquire land from the houses adjacent to build bigger. Also, the largest capital expenditure is the house itself, and the entire thing is being torn down and rebuilt. How is that different than A&M? Yeah houses would move but sell the old land and buy new land. It's College Station, land's cheap. 3. Of course if the sororities would build in a new location they would have to sell their old place. No one here is even imagining keeping the old house. Sure some sororities will be house-less during the rebuild but if it's well planned and done incrementally like Alabama then it shouldn't be a problem. 4. I don't think you're getting what we're saying. We're not saying just a few sororities move. We're saying all of them move to a new location. All 12 moving wouldn't be an issue. 5. What's the importance of Greek Life as a percentage of the student body? The issue with the houses deals with real numbers. The houses don't house 10% of the student body, they house 50. It does not matter what the percentage is if the real numbers keep rising. When you were a freshman, your PC numbers were in the 50s. By next year they'll be in the 100s. It's a numbers problem, and you're too blind to see it.