If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
nice

Poster Message:
This is actually pretty cool and it's nice to see that the pseudo-arbitrary rankings that are commonly accepted are somewhat backed by arbitrary mathematical ratings. One thing I would consider altering is splitting parties and philanthropies. Certain frats do one bigger/better than the other. No offense to Kappa Sig, although they have generally the best (and most) parties, they don't care much to do their philanthropy well. Giving them a 9 implies that their philanthropies are also good. Another thing, in all honesty, do you girls seriously get to know all the pledge classes? Do you know how big each frat is? The sense of brotherhood? That stuff seems impossible to truly quantify based on the day-to-days of Greek life and seems vulnerable to predispositioned biases that already are in place (e.g. why does Sig Chi have B7 but FIJI B10? Do you know their inner culture that well?) All in all, it'll be kinda fun if anyone goes through and rates them like this. It's essentially what the rankings page does but forces people to think out their responses, not just give the stupid 5-star or 1-star spam.