If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
ucla alumna

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />fall rush 1989<br /><br /> Poster Message:
I know you all probably don't care too much, but it is super interesting to see how much (and little) these rankings have changed at UCLA. I can't help but wonder how a house could decline so badly or rise to such heights. That's got to take A LOT of years of constant strong movement in one direction. It's weird to have my daughter going there now and having a completely different take on greek rankings. So, for fun, FYI, in fall of 1989 here was the legit ranking: sororitys: DG Kappa Theta Tri Delt P Phi Ad Pi ChiO Alpha Phi KD AE Phi AXO Gamma Phi Sigma Kappa Delta Zeta I am literally shocked that Tri-Delt declined so much. How did that happen? Also, Alpha Phi was a low mid. How did they become so good? AD Pi used to be just on the bubble of a top tier house. Gamma Phi Beta was really low and, just, ugh, no. The Frats were: Lambda Sigma Chi SAE (although they didn't do much socially, just had all the athletes) Sigma Nu Phi Psi ZBT Theta Xi Beta Sig Ep Theta Chi Sammy ATO Pi Kapp Sigma Pi gets kinda lost from there... Does anyone have a history on the changes and how long it took for these houses to change so much??