If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
don’t listen

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />TRUE SORORITY RATINGS <br /><br /> Poster Message:
Every single rank on this website is bs and I wouldn't listen to any of it tbh bc ill tell you what its mostly based on ADPI - reviews are based on the same 5 popular girls . Is critiqued for self ranking a lot but have some kind girls who are not as well known KKG - reviews based on 2 friend groups with their own drama , some good reviews are based on their “older” girls. often critiqued bc of one problematic girl in pc 22 who ppl like to dwell on cause its easy to then just say “the whole chapter” DG- reviews are based on the general frat man perspective, critiqued bc their girls dont spend time in the frat village as much ( who cares anyways) APHI - reviews on here are based on the quiet people who arent as heteronormative and are therefore “weird”. Reviews also based on 5 attractive girls (bc what else matters to a frat man or a freshly 18 yr old girl?) AOII - good reviews are based on their own perspective of themselves and are also critiqued by mid looking, insecure frat men who bash the looks of this chapter cause they cant face the reality of their receding hairline The point is all the sorority ranks are based off of 3-5 people and are made by mid frat men (only like 3 good looking ones in the system now) or by girls who are self absorbed and feed into the value placed on them in regards to their looks. Just take it with a grain of salt. Its literally the same experience no matter what one u go into