If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Lol

Poster Message:
Hey @also I can’t make sense of what you are saying. If he knows that he has been falsely accused why would he not try to move forward with his life? Our justice system, which I am told, is one of the best in the world and often modeled after, has decided, based on all the evidence gathered - “NOT guilty of SA”. I think we are putting ourselves into a very vulnerable position on this thread if we don’t speak factual. Once you are “trialed” for SA, the conviction rate is between 50.8%-58% depending which statistics you follow. Not the numbers what we are taught! From what I can read, this was not a “he says she says” only trial”. There were 5 witnesses plus the accused, so my logic tells me that justice Alison Wheeler (you should read up on her) believed his testimony/evidence that there was a prior conversation of consent. Witness evidence confirmed that there was also the “capacity to consent”. I am sure cases like this are never clean cut neither black and white but we have to be careful with our assumptions. Not sure what else to say. I am not interested in supporting one side or the other but I think we need context to something so flammable.