If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Somewhat true

Poster Message:
Couldn't agree more with some of the above comments. However, The person making the above comments is probably one of the same people on this site perpetuating "top tiers and lower tiers" and now trying to backtrack. After years of saying you can't get into a "top house" unless you're really really rich,or cute or from a certain zip code, (which according to "top tier women"makes them better than others) this person is now trying to say that those "top tier" houses actually have other priorities.(not true, never have) The truth is the so called "top tier" houses at SMU DO have lower GPA's and aren't involved on campus, and for years they have made their priorites quite clear.Leadership and involvement ARE important, because people with such interests will enjoy others with the same interests, and actually wouldn't be happy in a house where such things aren't regarded as valuable. And the women who value leadership, involvement and achievement (along with being social) should feel that the houses that value those things are "top tier" ( because they are) and shouldn't be made to feel that they are somehow choosing to join a house that is somehow less, simpy because it is advantageous to certain sororites on this site to perpetuate such myths. So every sorority is great for different reasons and for people with different objectives. Quit trying to say the so called "top tier" houses at SMU are more desireable or somehow have better quality women - not true