If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Fratty Scientist

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />sigma chi controversy<br /><br /> Poster Message:
On September 11th, Sigma Chi revealed there African American pledge to the IFC. Some Sigma Chi members were aware of this pledge several days before. According to the discussion section since September 11th, all posts about Sigma Chi were about tier rankings and stereotypes. Instead of bashing anyone, the content on these posts labeled Sigma Chi as a top tier southern tryhard chapter full of pretty boys. There were 5 rankings for Sigma Chi since the chapter revealed there pledge class. One user praised the chapter as top tier and was "impressed" by their black bid. Another user called them southern tryhards. Then all of a sudden a user says "all the fraternities are jealous" and assumes that people are showing "hate" for there black pledge. Then another Sigma Chi on the discussion section tries to label Sigma Chi as a chapter for the "cool, preppy popular kids" and people are jealous of the recent black bid. None of this adds up because I didn't find any content on this site making any negative comments towards the black pledge. In a matter of fact, the three references to the black pledge were actually positive and clearly the IFC community were "pleasantly surprised." So where are the accusations of hate over the black pledge coming from? This controversy is a fabrication and someone in the IFC are responsible so here are my 2 hypothesis.