If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
thoughts

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />ratings and self ranking analysis-for pnms<br /><br /> Poster Message:
Thought this would be cool to do. Self ranking seems common here so i figured i would input the highest to lowest number of ratingss for each active sorority correlated with the subject for debate/personal assumption of top/middle/bottom. Could show: who is ~more likely~to be self ranking and concerned about self image/status. DIsclaimer-> my own opinion and things I notice, the bottom/middle/top rankings are kind of arbitrary, but in general you see general trends here Alpha Phi - 894 (top) Sigma Kappa - 834 ( high bottom) Alpha Delta Pi -788(high bottom) Gamma Phi Beta - 763(bottom) Kappa Delta - 738 (middle) Delta Gamma - 726 (high middle) Alpha Chi Omega - 710 (middle) Zeta Tau Alpha - ΖΤΑ 658 (middle) Chi Omega - 604 (middle) Delta Zeta - 577(high middle) Pi Beta Phi - 513 (top) Sigma Delta Tau - 508 (bottom) Sigma Sigma Sigma - 505 (bottom) Delta Delta Delta -376 (top) Kappa Alpha Theta - 443 (top) Kappa Kappa Gamma - 408 top) FINDINGS: 1) sororities that people tend to think are top on average have some of the lowest ratings on greek rank. Alpha Phi is the outlier with almost 900 at the top of the list. 2) some sororites just dont really care to go on here like SDT/SSS/DZ( Conclusions: data doesnt lie, some sororities care more about status than others. This could give future pnms a greater look at what the sororities want/think like\n\n\n\n\n