If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
dont agree

Poster Message:
@cause celebre?: I do get your point about people waiting for guidance from their national. But, and its a big but, I think if you read all the articles on the Tufts situation and check out some of the social media what seems to become clearer is that the Tufts chapter tried and tried to get guidance and support from the national throughout the process. It seems that there was much waffling by the national and there were also periods of no communication. The ups and downs of the communication process with the national didn't inspire confidence in the local chapter and at a certain point they had to make a decision themselves. What the chapter seemed to experience was extreme waffling and game playing from the national to the point where is was becoming clearer and clearer that the national had no intention of making a decision before the necessary deadlines for membership. A few of the social media posts seems to imply that the national just wanted this issue and the involved person to go away so they didn't have to make a decision. Doesn't sound like a stand-up group to me but maybe this issue will be tested again soon and we will see how things are resolved. All in all, it didn't seem to be a respectful way to treat a PNM at all. Just my opinion.