If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
goodwork

Poster Message:
con't I appreciate that houses want to hide whether or not they didn't get a full class in the fall. These houses wouldn't need to hide the lack of full complement of pledges (i.e. fall rush lack of success/failure) IF THE INFORMATION WERE PUBLISHED. This gets back to the transparency issue. If people that went through recruitment could see online that xyz house didn't get the full 60 quota they could say wow, there is a possibility of COB and based on your friend of a friend strategy of filling up to quota then that person could try to network their way to the super secret COB. I honestly find this a waste of time for everyone and is an insult to the intelligence of the ladies trying to go through the COB process. If you can't come to terms with eliminating the COB then why not have a 'unified' COB. All houses could advertise together, put up a single schedule on the panhel website and have some semblance of a process vs. the super secret COB. Its possible to hide behind the curtain of being private membership clubs and all that involves but I don't think this means its OK to have no public/published legitimate process. I tried to back track through all the math you described in your other posts today to get to the COB numbers to find out what we are talking about. I think I am close to the numbers but if possible could you put up the numbers by house. You don't have to put it up with house name just organize it by #1, #2 etc. Thanks so much!