If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
goodwork

Poster Message:
page 4 - are what we as a system are dealing with and I think we owe it to ourselves to maintain a process that is fair and open to all. Closed COB to me is just that closed and does zero in my opinion to foster goodwill throughout the entire CAL community. I really do think that as a group its important to agree on what we value and how we want pnms to feel going through recruitment regardless of whether the pnm ends up staying or going. I think its super important for the person choosing to exit recruitment to have had a very positive experience with recruitment so there is no doubt in their mind that they played on a level field. I don't think the field was level this fall and I hear you on the issue of the structure of recruitment. So, if it truly was structure and process then why not shake things up. As someone else posted elsewhere I do hope that university level outsiders evaluate what just happened this fall as truly all the talk of shared bid lists and negative chatter here and elsewhere about those houses that took minorities has no place at Cal. I am not sure why there can't be some kind of panhel proclamation on these issues as I believe the issues to be quite serious. Let's debate!