If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
tryagain

Poster Message:
Hmmm, I thought about your situation again and I have to agree with Good question response. The pledge class size issue is one that needs to be reevaluated in light of what happened with fall recruitment. Some houses stepped up beyond what they were required to do (good citizens) and some didn't because they were not required to (bad citizens). A 'good' house is one where you feel comfortable and where you believe you will enjoy being for 4 years. The issue of exclusivity discussed by Good question is not just perception but a reality unfortunately. But keep in mind it is the systems rules perpetuating this unfortunate reality. Without a discussion of what happened this fall and a look at the rules and quota requirements then the system will continue to lose great pnms. For what it is worth I personally believe kappa was one of the 'bad actors' in this falls recruitment based on pledge class size. I also think someone outside the system should review the lists through each step of the recruitment process and verify that things were handled properly. I don't think things were handled well this year AT ALL. Regardless of the perception of the house, would you really want to be affiliated with a group that chooses to do what it wanted to do rather than help out in a year where there were alot of issues, including the loss of a house? Do your own thinking and forget about rankings as there are great people at each of the houses. FORGET RANKINGS.