If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
not sure

Poster Message:
if this comment is so ignorant. I don't agree with the dismissive tone, but the point seems to be that with recruitment structured the way it is, a chapter can survive with pledge classes of 10 to 15 for a long time. The fact that their charter was revoked suggests they were getting less than 10 which is awful any way you look at it. Sure, they can bring in girls from other schools to rush a founding class, but what happens when they leave? The alumni have already proven themselves to be inept or unwilling. I also disagree with the comment that there is a lack of choices here at ucsd given the number of panhel, cultural and special interest sororities we have. I think what the writer meant to say is that there is a lack of good choices in panhel and if that's the case, then why not bring in an APhi or ZTA? Why do we need another mediocre house? I don't know any chapter who came back stronger after their charter was revoked. Not one.