If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
^^^

Poster Message:
I agree with #8. You can say that sororities consistently do better than others, but that is not reflected in these tier rankings. Retention rates, GPAs, socials, other awards mean nothing in these ranks. You're going based on ideas of "hot"ness. Sororities who are "falling" in looks remain at the top because in the past they had attractive members. (Even though they don't now...) Four sororities constantly at the bottom: AOII, GPhiB, SK, AST. All four of those sororities have done well. They've pulled in attractive girls. They've had many socials with "top" frats (SAE or Sig Tau). They've won awards and other Greek Life recognitions. Yet they remain at the bottom because they don't recruit based on looks. Although their last pledge classes turned out better looking than some of the "top" sororities. One could argue AGD and ZTA don't recruit based on looks but we all know this site is trolled by them, or why else would they remain at the top. What has ZTA done to deserve to be the top? ... I mean even though AGD pulled a less attractive and less involved pledge class in comparison to the bottom four I mentioned, the sorority as a whole has done decently. Their older members are involved, they had highest GPA last year. I could at least understand why they'd be at the top/middle if these ranks were based on who is doing well. But they aren't. They're based on who used to be the most attractive and who cares to troll this site the most.