If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Kayla

Poster Message:
The higher number of PMNs doesn't mean cuts will be worse. I'm a math major, so here are some statistics: According to UARK, 93% of women are placed. This means that if there are 1500 women registered, 93% on bid day would be 1395. 1395 divided by 11 houses would make a quota of around 126. 126 x the 5 top houses is 630. This means that 45% of the bids will go to these houses. Let's say the number this year is 2150. (Just a random guess, but the recruitment office did say it is a record number.) 93% on bid day would be 1999. This would make a quota of around 181. The 5 top houses would get 905. Again, 45% of the bids will go to these houses. Unless the university enforces a lower quota number for the top houses, PMNs will have the same mathematical chances they've had for the many years. I would doubt the university would lower quota numbers for specific houses, but I cannot imagine having a pledge class of close to 200!! Good luck to all those going through recruitment!