If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Perfect Example

Poster Message:
This is a perfect example of an unnecessary Greekrank post that is completely misleading. SAE and AEPI are not "clearly" better than Kappa Sig. Plenty of top sorority girls think Kappa Sigs are the most fun and attractive guys or choose certain Kappa Sigs over guys in SAE or AEPI. In addition, plenty of specific groups of sorority girls would say that they find members of ATO or ZBT more fun or attractive than KA's, Sig Chi's, or Sig Nu's. Just look at how filled ZBT's tailgates were this year compared to KA's; not a knock on KA because MOST girls probably do find the guys better at KA, but there are definitely people on campus that do not find them "obviously" better than ZBT. Furthermore, many guys choose to rush ZBT whose first choice is AEPI or KSig, not because they feel they have a better chance with ZBT than KA or Sig Chi, but rather because they think its a better frat and it is not "obvious" enough that they are on different levels with girls. And it is certainly not "obvious to anyone on campus" that Fiji is better than DTD, Phi, Psi, and PIKE. An argument can easily be made for any of them being best of the third tier. However, to the posters point: You really don't see Phi Psi guys hooking up with the same level of girls as ATO guys, and you won't see ZBT's hooking up with the same level of girls as AEPI guys. Whereas, even if most girls find KA guys better than ZBT guys, it is definitely not a consensus that KA guys are better. Furthermore, you can't really make a reasonable argument that Sig Nu is better than KSig but you CAN make plenty of reasonable arguments for why they are better than Sig Chi, which is why they are the same tier. You are trying to make divides that are completely pointless and misleading and you are only proving the poster's point.