bid possibility
by: PNMI am a sophomore at State and want to know how much I will stand out since I didn't rush last year. I needed to transition first before rushing and now I'm worried it will count against me. Any thoughts?
#1by: Quotas
There is a separate upperclassmen quota for sororities. You will be judged in strength just against other upperclassmen. So long as your grades, involvement, and personality are up to scratch you won't be hindered simply because you aren't a freshmen. Hope this helps, good luck!
#4by: Greeke
The reason they gave for eliminating the upperclassman quota was to try and help all groups (especially the newer, smaller ones) achieve quota. I do not think this will work like they want it to.
I believe that while it COULD help smaller groups achieve quota (which could be momentary...as we all know that retention is the key issue), it will not help them in the longrun because to have a solid, stable chapter, you need an even, equal cross-section of all ages. And if a group is unable to successfully recruit a good number of freshmen, then they are left with lots of 2 & 3 year members...and very little chance of long-term leadership.
It is interesting that MSU is eliminating this quota for that reason (which is helping smaller groups), because, ironically, that is the exact reason most campuses give for instituting the upperclassman quota in the first place. Across the nation, campus leadership was finding that one of the reasons small, struggling chapters were continuing to struggle was that they were getting upperclassmen instead of freshmen...which resulted in little-to-no 4 year members, thus a lack of strong, continuous leadership. I hope I'm wrong...but I see this move by the school to ultimately be a bad one for upperclassmen and result in lower numbers of upperclassmen participating in formal recruitment and higher numbers of those who do participate dropping out before bid day.
#5by: Greeke
BTDubs.... I believe the REAL reason for the change in quota is that some chapters really resented the ultimatum of either choosing to take lots of upperclassmen (that they would not have pledged as freshmen) or be labeled as "not making quota." So, I believe some of these larger groups (1 in particular) pitched a fit about the upperclassman quota and found a way to try to sell Greek life on eliminating it. The reason they chose was 'helping the smaller groups make quota.'
Now, I don't know who's dumber... The chapter who came up with that lame reason and sold it to Greek Life, or the Greek Life personnel who believed it? Neither are very Panhelleniclly minded, if you want to know the truth. Anybody with a brain in their head could see that this is just a way for larger groups to avoid working with the system to pledge upperclassmen.
It's sad.
#6by: Greeke
Woah, woah now...getting defensive? WHY? Ain't nobody got time for that.
This is accurate. Ask anyone in the Greek life office. Don't get all crazy. Simma down now. Let's just let this play out and we'll see how many upperclassmen each group takes. The numbers don't lie and that will tell the tale. Wait and see.
#8by: changes
The bashing is ridiculous. These posts are not even coming from these chapters - just a way to stir it up. "I know" is correct that it is a panhellenic vote. And upperclassmen are a great addition to chapters big and small - that is not even an issue. No chapter is even upset about this - just this forum trying to bash a little before recruitment.
Post Reply
Before you type: Please do not post individual names, defaming content, or spam. Remember, cyber bullying can be considered a crime.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: Well
the MSU Panhellenic website makes no mention of changes in the upperclassman quota.