Top Fraternity vs. top sorority definition

by: Rushing this fallJun 18, 2024 1:27:00 PM

Just an observation I had. When people talk about top fraternities it's usually based on social status, looks, popularity, parties/tailgates, and grades to a much lesser degree. As opposed to what a lot of people say about sororities being top based on grades and being genuine. Why is social status less of a factor?

Just wondering why the definitions seem to be so different when people have these discussions on here and in real life. Obviously I know it's apples and oranges, and maybe I'm talking to the wrong people. It just seems like there are 3 top fraternities based on xyz criteria and then sororities are judged on completely different factors. Why is that?

Posted By: Rushing this fallJun 18, 2024 1:27:00 PM

Post Reply

3
0
1032 Views

Report

Page 1 of 1

#1 by: What are you talkingabout Jun 18, 2024 5:09:12 PM

1. There is very little status to being in any fraternity at Mizzou except Beta. The others are wannabes.
2. Beta emphasizes grades, unlike most other frats.
3. If you think PiPhi, Theta, ChiO etc. have no social status, you don't know what you are talking about.
4. Most fraternities are full of drunk punks who couldn't make the dean's list if they tried. So they resort to doing the thing they know best: partying.
5. Sorority women in top houses are so over that. They date frat guys only if they are the exception to the rule. No one needs some frat bro barfing on their shoes and coming before a woman is satisfied. Even though that's pretty much the norm.

By: What are you talkingaboutJun 18, 2024 5:09:12 PM