national tiers
by: nat#2by: Top
SAE, SX, EN, KS, Fiji, Phi Delt, KA, ATO, Pi Kapp, Pike, Beta, Lambda Chi, and Sig Ep are probably the top 13 national fraternities at the undergraduate level today. Because of the regional nature it'd be difficult to narrow it to 10, and basically on SAE and SX would be considered top 5 in every region. After that, others like OX, DTD, DX, Phi Psi and DKE come to mind.
#3by: Sororities
Strongest 6 Nationally: Theta, Pi Phi, Kappa, DDD, DG, XO
Really Strong Nationally: ADPi, ZTA, A Phi, G Phi, AXO, DZ
Strong Nationally, a bit more regional: Phi Mu, KD, SK, AGD, AOPi, AZD (not at Bama)
Weak Nationally: All those sororities we don't have at Bama (except SDT)
For the record, I'm from the East Coast but went to HS in California. I'm now a sophomore at Bama. Some of the better sororities in the South aren't really that strong nationally. Keep that in mind before you freak out over good Bama sororities being ranked lower than not so good Bama sororities.
#4by: Really
All you can do is look at the number of chapters each sorority has, and maybe at the amount of money they raise for their philanthropy, or their foundation, or both.
Tiers are way more of a local thing and it varies campus to campus.
At the NPC level, each NPC group has 1 vote. It's not based on number of members.
#7by: True
True. There are no sororities or fraternities that could be said to be top tier nationally. All reputations are regional. I would also agree that anyone who says that certain houses are in a top tier nationally would only be able to tell you what houses were tops in the locations they were familiar with. By the way, why do you care? You only go to one university, so look at a house's reputation at Alabama. As for after college, it's totally not important. Look at your alums and you'll know that there are all kinds of women and men in every house.
#8by: Well...
I would not put ADPi above AXO or APhi nationally. Maybe not KD or DG either. They are all very good. Xo, DDD, ZTA are all huge nationally, but they put their chapters in lots and lots of small schools, and not all strong Greek systems. AOPi, GPhi, and AGD are currently growing their numbers by doing the same thing. Nothing wrong with it. I would just say that KKG and PiPhi...maybe Theta..are the most selective about where they put chapters. Then maybe DG and APhi. Great sororities all of them. No bashing intended. Just observation.
#10by: Bad advice
The national "powerhouses" are XO, ZTA,DG, PiPhi, kappa .... DDD is up there as well, it is inaccurate to say the alumnae system is t important because it is. With that said pick the sorority you feel best with.... But if you like a sorority but are focused on its image on the campus, I think it would be good to see how they are in the region you are planning on living. It does matter.
Post Reply
Before you type: Please do not post individual names, defaming content, or spam. Remember, cyber bullying can be considered a crime.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: ^
Kappa Sig, Pi Kapp, Pike, are all fairly good in the South if not "historically big." That might be accurate to say from a historical standpoint, but I'd say they're all basically rising in Southern profile and their success is more recent aside from a few campuses (like Bama). EN, EX, SAE, Phi Delt, Fiji, and KA are the clear frontrunners of the region, but Pike, Pi Kapp, and Kappa Sig are present on a lot of Southern campuses and have solid chapters at them. ATO is historically strong in the South, but have fallen off lately and are probably more comparable to the other 3 these days. They're all top tier at a lot of smaller Southern public universities, and tend to be middle or upper middle at most SEC/ACC schools. Sig Ep is huge nationally, and definitely deserves a mention in the "big but not historically good in the South". EN and ATO are a lot stronger outside the South than KA from what I've seen, but KA is a fair amount stronger than those 2 in the South. TKE is interesting because they have a great alumni list and even have more good chapters than they're given credit for, but they just have such a large percentage of terrible chapters that they discredit the other ones.