fraternity comments

ATO is not on the same level as theta chi, pike and sigma chi.

I am not affiliated with Kappa Sigma, though I recognize their historical value to the University of Alabama Greek system, whether they are down or not.
Nor am I here to bash other houses merely for the sake of down ranking. My assessments of the top 15/16 are constructively and critically fair and accurate from an historical perspective and present one.

hahah thank god someone got them out of the top 5.....

as far as Im concerned Sigma Nus are heroes they finally got lambda chi and ATO out of the top 5 and put them where they belong. They didnt do anything wrong in my eyes

1. It is difficult not to have an Old Row bias, as you understand.
2. I agree with you on EN, I remember playing (and beating them handily) in intramural football, and all the ENs did the entire time was throw fits to the refs that we were cheating. It's in their dna I guess, to cry when they don't get their way.
On a personal level, I can't stand EX, but they are popular with women.
As to who is configuring these rankings, I can't say and don't want to point fingers

it is clear that none of you are current students at the university of alabama. A lot has changed, like it or not it has. some of the things said here make it all to clear most of you are not students anymore. go to the houses and look at the quality of men that houses have had in their recent pledge classes and judge, not based off some made up superlatives from 10 years ago.I am not going to do any ranking but when your on campus and you notice that no girls are at your houses partys, or you never have good parties that its not that the unviversity "cracking down sooo hard" its only because your as good anymore. when you start compromising on the men you give bids to is the moment you start downward and that has happend in spades at certain once great houses here. things are beyond changing, they have already changed.i know you'll never accept that fact but someone needs to tell you. this is a different time, let the houses who have risen have their time with the few who stayed up

Herder, you're persuasive, but rating EN where you do hurts your credibility. At minimum you should disclaim ("based on their first 100 years" or what not)

Ha. It's not like you to forget your integrity. No matter how much ATO bothers you, the blatant cheating against them should bother you more.

Herder, you're persuasive, but rating EN where you do hurts your credibility. At minimum you should disclaim ("based on their first 100 years" or what not)

Ha. It's not like you to forget your integrity. No matter how much ATO bothers you, the blatant cheating against them should bother you more.

Herder, you're persuasive, but rating EN where you do hurts your credibility. At minimum you should disclaim ("based on their first 100 years" or what not)

Ha. It's not like you to forget your integrity. No matter how much ATO bothers you, the blatant cheating against them should bother you more.

Herder, you're persuasive, but rating EN where you do hurts your credibility. At minimum you should disclaim ("based on their first 100 years" or what not)

Ha. It's not like you to forget your integrity. No matter how much ATO bothers you, the blatant cheating against them should bother you more.