sorority comments

I don't think pi phi is included in the big six, but the other ones seem correct.

What is your big six? To not include pi phi because of one off year is ridiculous.

Pi Phi has never been part of the big 5 here. Anyone talking about a big 6 does not go to A&M - that only applies to TU. And PiPhi is either at the lower middle tier or more likely at the top of the bottom grouping. Yes, one bad pledge class can lead to a downward spiral. Look at ADPi.

adpi was never on top here. Things are the same as they were 15 years ago. What are you smoking?

at texas they have their big six, but at a&m their big three is the only thing comparable.
tridelt, kappa, chi-o

theta is also pretty up there.

Want a name? Choose the so called "big 3".

Want a true sisterhood and great greek experience? Choose ANY of the others.

First of all, yes, at texas they have the "big six" but to say zeta, chi-o and tridelt are on the same level as PKT is insane. Second of all, "the big 3" at a&m is ridiculous.It doesn't exist. Honestly, there are 7 chapters that are fine to pledge. PNMs, nothing on this site is true so please don't believe any of it. Talk to your friends in sororities and go through rush with an open mind. These ranks are all messed up. Do not believe them.

Why would they not be on the same level at Texas? If you look at the statistics, A&M and UT have nearly the same number of students and an identical 12% of sorority undergrad women. Just because Texas is known to have a very competitive rush does NOT mean that Aggie women don't compare. Gig em

I meant that yes, texas does have a big six, but to imply that all six are equal, like you are doing with the "big 3" at A&M is wrong.

That wasn't me referring to the "big 3" I was just replying to your comment. No one even implied that any sororities were equal only that some were better. I agree that there aren't 3 top ones