let's think about this

Every time I see someone comment on a post that puts Chi O or Pi Phi relatively high on a superficial "rankings" list, someone comments "Those Chi O's and Pi Phis, they're at it again, trying to boost their 'rankings'" or something along those lines. Then they proceed to say that pi phi or chi o should be lower. There's an easy answer to who is bashing all the houses, think about it. Kappa and Theta are pretty much set in stone as top houses, so they have nothing to gain by bashing. All the middle tier houses are also set in stone, except for gphi who believes they should be higher. It is widely considered that pi phi and tri delt are middle-top and no one really knows where to put Chi O except "everyone" agrees they should be moved down. The real question is WHO would benefit from saying that pi phi/chi o should be lower? Should both of them be placed lower? Probably, but it's strategic as to why they are always the targets. Use your brain as to who is "bashing"