observation

DDD is sketchy

Look up OSU follies on you tube- PiPhi and beta did house of stone and I think it's zeta and sig ep that do the using DDD copied. Also Woodstock was taken directly from Broadway's Motown- at least you had to substitute songs and history on that one-- last yr was direct copying except for the stunt work that wasn't allowed.

Your are correct in that House of Stone and the show tri delt did are one in the same. It doesn't however mean they didn't execute at a high level and win the competition that way. A high school can do a production of Chicago and not even come close to being as good as college let alone professional production. Motown didn't even open til the same month as the scandals performance so there is no chance of a connection there.

A high school has to pay a royalty to produce a show like Chicago otherwise it's illegal because it's theif. If you copy someone else you stole it. DDD did not have permission and stole someone else's work and passed it off as there own creation.

You only have to pay if it's copyrighted. The type of thing you accuse DDD of doing the same are not copyrighted. It's like a production of Sleeping Beauty. You don't have to pay. Besides the two performances look different in most respects. You have to be trying to make something out of it to even think they're the same.

No copyright, no case. Tri delt also didn't stand to make any money by producing the show they did or for that matter do any of the organizations that participate in homecoming, u-sing, or sooner scandals. The OSU show also didn't own the rights to any of the music that was sung and couldn't claim infringement to begin with. If :) is looking to do a little bit of research, I am sure she could find some supreme court rulings on the matter. At the end of the day they produced a small, 12 minute show that was seen by around 2,000 people. It was insignificant outside of the event.

If you are proud of taking someone else's work and putting your name on it, then do it. It speaks volumes about character. When you present something as your own and it's not you've stolen it. If winning a competition by stealing someone else's creativity is worth it to you do it. Most Greeks at OU are better than that.

Agree they should have some integrity and if not at least some pride in themselves not to take another school's s how and present it as their own creation that's sketchy.

Expectation is for each group to create a show. They steal. If you are comfortable with that being the image continue debating. It's stolen and shouldn't reflect any OU Greek house or OU itself. DDD has no integrity

DDD didn't interpret anything OSU PBP and Beta did. All DDD did was steal their show which includes their interpretation because it was their EXACT same show. It's not justifiable.

You've given your opinion. Most disagree. Drop it now.

Wrong just the tridelta disagree. Everyone else is still talking about the lack of integrity and character of DDD. Seems the girls who went through recruitment though the same thing which explains your new babies. Heard CAC is fully aware of what happened last year and has seen the video too and aren't happy about it either.

Yep I think she proved it watch the video

I'm not a lawyer but all you have to do to copyright something is say it is copyrighted.

Yep should make a movie... DDD exposed and unhinged

Prove that it is DDD. If you're going to say something, offer proof. Otherwise you just look like a silly fool.

Everyone else isn't embarrassed by DDDs behavior just DDD and that's why they bump the silly articles whenever their stealing of OSUs show is mentioned or the bad recruitment they had. No one else would wAste their time typing and bumping stupid articles to cover truthful posts everyone knows about.

Do true

Yeah. She has no proof who's posting. She's an out-and-out liar and she's beating a dead horse. No one agrees with her and she po'd.