observation
by: InterestingWhoever started bumping articles and jokes did it when people were asking about what happened to DDDs new babies and their recruitment. Eventually it stopped and allowed Chi Omega, Gamma Phi Beta, Alpha Phi, Kappa Kappa Gamma, Kappa Alpha Theta,and Pi Beta Phi to have nasty anonymous things written about their houses. No jokes or articles were bumped to cover any of the nasty comments up. However as soon as a post is written asking if DDD copied their current u sing performance from you tube as they had last year for using and scandals, the bumping of jokes and articles started again. I've heard this site is crawling with the DDD girls and I'm beginning to think it's true.
#1 by: Me
Totally agree it's DDD. First she answers the question about stealing from you tube as "inspiration" and then she bps all her posts with jokes and articles. I think it's obvious why they had such a bad recruitment. I bet it's the same chick that write everything about all the houses before recruitment too. It wasn't any house but DDD.
Commentby: ^Oct 28, 2014 10:38:33 AM
Look up OSU follies on you tube- PiPhi and beta did house of stone and I think it's zeta and sig ep that do the using DDD copied. Also Woodstock was taken directly from Broadway's Motown- at least you had to substitute songs and history on that one-- last yr was direct copying except for the stunt work that wasn't allowed.
- 0
- 0
by: IIIIIIIIIOct 28, 2014 8:29:58 PM
Your are correct in that House of Stone and the show tri delt did are one in the same. It doesn't however mean they didn't execute at a high level and win the competition that way. A high school can do a production of Chicago and not even come close to being as good as college let alone professional production. Motown didn't even open til the same month as the scandals performance so there is no chance of a connection there.
- 0
- 0
by: ^Oct 28, 2014 8:33:26 PM
A high school has to pay a royalty to produce a show like Chicago otherwise it's illegal because it's theif. If you copy someone else you stole it. DDD did not have permission and stole someone else's work and passed it off as there own creation.
- 0
- 0
by: Actually Oct 28, 2014 9:20:50 PM
You only have to pay if it's copyrighted. The type of thing you accuse DDD of doing the same are not copyrighted. It's like a production of Sleeping Beauty. You don't have to pay. Besides the two performances look different in most respects. You have to be trying to make something out of it to even think they're the same.
- 0
- 0
by: IIIIIIIIIOct 28, 2014 11:11:55 PM
No copyright, no case. Tri delt also didn't stand to make any money by producing the show they did or for that matter do any of the organizations that participate in homecoming, u-sing, or sooner scandals. The OSU show also didn't own the rights to any of the music that was sung and couldn't claim infringement to begin with. If :) is looking to do a little bit of research, I am sure she could find some supreme court rulings on the matter. At the end of the day they produced a small, 12 minute show that was seen by around 2,000 people. It was insignificant outside of the event.
- 0
- 0
by: ^Oct 28, 2014 11:23:59 PM
If you are proud of taking someone else's work and putting your name on it, then do it. It speaks volumes about character. When you present something as your own and it's not you've stolen it. If winning a competition by stealing someone else's creativity is worth it to you do it. Most Greeks at OU are better than that.
- 0
- 0
by: @aboveOct 29, 2014 8:42:50 AM
Agree they should have some integrity and if not at least some pride in themselves not to take another school's s how and present it as their own creation that's sketchy.
- 0
- 0
by: ^Oct 29, 2014 2:39:23 PM
Expectation is for each group to create a show. They steal. If you are comfortable with that being the image continue debating. It's stolen and shouldn't reflect any OU Greek house or OU itself. DDD has no integrity
- 0
- 0
by: @IIIIIIIOct 29, 2014 2:41:43 PM
DDD didn't interpret anything OSU PBP and Beta did. All DDD did was steal their show which includes their interpretation because it was their EXACT same show. It's not justifiable.
- 0
- 0
by: STOPOct 29, 2014 10:04:22 PM
by: @aboveOct 29, 2014 10:08:09 PM
Wrong just the tridelta disagree. Everyone else is still talking about the lack of integrity and character of DDD. Seems the girls who went through recruitment though the same thing which explains your new babies. Heard CAC is fully aware of what happened last year and has seen the video too and aren't happy about it either.
- 0
- 0
by: @5Oct 30, 2014 12:22:31 PM
by: CopyrightOct 31, 2014 8:13:33 PM
I'm not a lawyer but all you have to do to copyright something is say it is copyrighted.
- 0
- 0
by: ^Nov 2, 2014 9:32:12 PM
by: Prove itOct 29, 2014 10:05:39 PM
Prove that it is DDD. If you're going to say something, offer proof. Otherwise you just look like a silly fool.
- 0
- 0
by: @aboveOct 29, 2014 10:15:59 PM
Everyone else isn't embarrassed by DDDs behavior just DDD and that's why they bump the silly articles whenever their stealing of OSUs show is mentioned or the bad recruitment they had. No one else would wAste their time typing and bumping stupid articles to cover truthful posts everyone knows about.
- 0
- 0
by: ^Oct 29, 2014 10:21:17 PM
by: HA HAOct 29, 2014 11:50:45 PM
Yeah. She has no proof who's posting. She's an out-and-out liar and she's beating a dead horse. No one agrees with her and she po'd.
- 0
- 0
Post Reply
Before you type: Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: TrueOct 31, 2014 8:03:01 AM
DDD is sketchy
- 0
- 0
Report