numbers
by: facts is facts
The poster below said these numbers were true well the other three columns in the university's report were just as true. Can't help some sororities didn't want to report some numbers that might be potentially embarrassing.
% of membership involved in other university groups:
Phi Mu 100%
Theta. 100%
KD. 95%
KKG 85%
DG. 80%
Chi O. 75%
DDD. 60%
AOPi. 40%
Pi Phi. DNR
$ Raised for Charity
DDD. $113065
KKG. $65000
KD. $47000
Chi O. $40000
Phi Mu. $35250
AOPi. $16000
DG. $8672
Pi Phi. Um yeah
Service Hours Performed:
KKG 2000
KD 1650
Phi Mu. 1500
DG. 1365
Theta. 1245
AOPi. 1047
Chi O. 500
DDD reported 0 must just had Daddy pay :)
Pi Phi no hours reported
those are the numbers released by the school.\n\n\n\n\n
Comment#3by: As I tried
to point out on the other post, these numbers are not reflections of what sororities do. Some sororities classify money for charity as money into their philanthropy. Some count that as money donated to a cause outside of their philanthropy. And some didn't report WHICH DOESN'T MEAN THEY HAD NONE OR THAT "DADDY PAID IT OFF." I have no idea what sororities count as involved in the University, but I know Theta's that don't do anything other than Theta and they have 100%, and I know TONS of AOPI's from campus involvement and they listed 40%. I think the only CONCRETE reflection of each chapter was that of GPA and size. This is just girls in lower houses who are trying really hard to make the top look no different than them.
#5by: hmm
by: It
doesn't matter if that is what the school reports. Where does one get this information? The actives have to report it to the sorority. Well...what if someone doesn't report it or fill out the survey? Then that person doesn't go into the calculation.
Additionally, $ for charity can be counted differently for every sorority.
If they laid out rules for how this is supposed to be done, it'd be more useful.
- 0
- 0
#7by: For the record
DG is in the top 5 chapters nationally to donate the most funds for their philanthropy, so that $8,000 # is not how much they did for Service for Sight. I think girls are trying to use these #s to make certain groups look bad, especially if they didn't report a #, and that's not right.
by: Are
you sure it's all self-reported? I'm pretty sure the grades are not self-reported, and that they come from the school...also the # of actives is obvious to the school too.
- 0
- 0
#9by: self reports
Obviously you have never held an executive office in your sorority. Even grades are self reported no one in panhellenic goes through 4500 students to get grades.That would not be legal anyway because no one but the student has access because of Hipaa. Maybe there is alot of padding going on there too,hmmmm. And it should not be hard to get such "top quality" girls to turn in something if it is requested. And by the looks of some of the tops "quality bookkeeping " I would bet membership are way off too. If you cant get them to turn in other reports I guarantee transfers,inactives and drops are not being correctly reported either. Panhellenic does not keep some giant database they micromanage it is up to each sororities exec.
by: Okay
but I know that my sorority's GPA is not self-reported. We have an officer on our exec board who takes care of that. Additionally, the exec board takes care of the # of actives being reported. And the $ for charity is taken care of by the exec board.
The rest of the stuff is self-reported.
And there are many reasons that someone can forget to turn the stuff in.
- 0
- 0
Post Reply
Before you type: Please do not post individual names, defaming content, or spam. Remember, cyber bullying can be considered a crime.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: i
agree. kd, phi mu, and kappa are consistent and are in the top spots
- 0
- 0
Report