This is why we will never agree on ranks

Tier Considerations:
Campus relevance, strong membership & retention, new member class, looks, personality, social life, philanthropy events, srat & frat relations, Greek involvement, diversity, gpa, leadership, achievements, remaining in good standing with ofsl, house/no house.

That’s how all of us are not just one she lmfao. You’re the she who wants to make that not important bc ur the only chapter who doesn’t have it lmao

No well agreed on these Ranking considerations and they are weighted on socials and looks. I’m tired of the moderator and I’m not even Chi O. She’s a whack job and wants every chapter lower.

Nobody called any of those chapters those names in so long lmfao

If you compare PiPhi to Axid you would see how similar they are, even with the weighted tier considerations. Same with Theta & ChiO.

It takes more than just socials to make a strong chapter. We could exist without fraternities because we are a sisterhood not a dating service. We want well rounded chapters. That’s why
we consider everything. Do you even know about Values Based Recruitment? You must be a guy.

idk if “she” wants every chapter lower. that’s one post and could be anyone. it’s not fair to blame everything on one person. there are various reasons that ppl want chio down. nobody else is moving down or even proposed to move down seriously. its literally just ur chapter

Everyone in greek cares about looks socials and popularity. The only chapters who don’t prioritize that are you aephi kkg chio pikapp. Everyone else does.

OX EX PHIXELT ATO KSIG DU ZBT SAE DSIG TKE
KD ZTA ADPI DDD PIPHI AXID THETA

ChiO that’s the point of greek life. Popularity looks socials at every school. No other school includes ur loser stuff. And no single girl wants every single chapter down. Nobody else is moved down, just you

loser stuff? you have real problems. this all matters and im not a chi omega. everyone but you prioritizes this stuff. rep, diversity, membership and performance all matters.

Popularity: + 2
Socials: + 2
Looks: + 2
Hoco Pair:
Leadership:
Involvement:
Reputation:
Diversity:


Philo Event:
Comp Wins:

Greek Achievements:
House:
Membership:
GPA:

Comparing PiPhi to ChiO There’s a reason we’re the only school who does this.

Popularity: Piphi
Socials: PiPhi
Looks: PiPhi
Hoco Pair: PiPhi
Leadership: ChiO
Involvement: ChiO
Reputation: ChiO
Diversity: ChiO


Philo Event: ChiO
Comp Wins: =

Greek Achievements: ChiO
House: ChiO
Membership: ChiO
GPA: ChiO

Ur comparisons to show axid is with piphi doesn’t change anyone’s mind

uppers need top pairs. if they didn’t why do they all have them? mids pair with mids. upper mids pair with true mids when they have no other choice. they are upper mid bc they can and have paired with tops and look better than true mid.

Uppers do not need top pairs, they need top socials, upper pairs. You lie about this every discussion

Mids need mid socials and mid pairs. No one even needs upper socials they are mid for a reason

Top- most popular, top socials and pairs

Upper- upper popularity (not top) Toos can get top pairs, that’s the difference.

True Mid- mid popularity (not upper)

Top: THETA CHI / SIG CHI / ATO / KSIG
Upper Mid: PHIDELT / ZBT / DU / SAE
True Mid: DSIG / TKE / FIJI
Lower Mid: PIKAPP
Base: BETA / TEP / DTD / PIKE

Fraternity Membership Over Last 3 Semesters (Spr ‘24, Fall ‘23, Spr ‘23)


ΘX - 102, 87, 114

ΣX - 81, 65, 33

ΑΤΩ - 104, 84, 95

ΚΣ - 73, 41, 56
ΦΔΘ - 54, 63, 43

ΖΒΤ - 39, 43, 53

ΔΥ - 59, 62, 53

ΣΑΕ - 57, 60, 58

ΔΣΦ - 53, 59, 52

TKE - 77, 59, 48
ΦΓΔ - 58, 61, 53


ΠΚΦ - 48, 54, 46


ΒΘΠ - 36, 30 (New Fall ‘23)
(No Data Yet)

ΤΕΦ (New Fall ‘24
)
ΔΤΔ (New Fall ‘24)