ChiO v. AEPhi
by: Lmao
Interesting observation
Reputatation: ΑΕΦ > ΧΩ
Popularity: ΧΩ > ΑΕΦ
Looks: ΧΩ = ΑΕΦ
Diversity: ΧΩ > ΑΕΦ
Socials: ΑΕΦ > ΧΩ
Involvement: ΧΩ = ΑΕΦ
Leadership: ΧΩ > ΑΕΦ
Philo Event: ΑΕΦ > ΧΩ
Social Life: ΑΕΦ > ΧΩ
House: ΧΩ > ΑΕΦ
Membership: ΑΕΦ > ΧΩ
Retention: ΑΕΦ > ΧΩ
Socials:
ΧΩ - Mixes with one true mid (the lowest one) lower mid and base tier.
ΑΕΦ - Mixes with three true mids, lower mids and base tiers.
Pairs:
ΧΩ - ΦΓΔ, ΤΚΕ, ΦΓΔ (mid, mid, mid)
ΑΕΦ - ΤΕΦ, ΦΓΔ, ΤΚΕ (base, mid, mid)
You can have a better hoco pair and still be in the same league. Happens all the same. Just because you got a better pair doesn’t mean you’re a whole tier above when you have nothing else above them.
______________________________
ΚΑΘ v. ΧΩ
Socials: Don’t share a single social relation.
Pairs: Don’t share a single pair in the last 3 years.
#1 by: Very comparable
ChiO was one of the only Sororities to support DU, DU rejected a social with them but did AEPhi.
ChiO was once TKE’s strong relation, after AEPhi. TKE dropped ChiO but not AEPhi.
SAE has socials with AEPhi but not ChiO.
ZBT hangs with AEPhi but not ChiO.
Looks are equal
Post Reply
Before you type: Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: LolNov 2, 2024 12:07:21 PM
Axid got SAE, DSig, Uppers-ZBT & DU, Theta didn’t
Theta got DSig, Unpaired, DSig, TKE
Chi O got Fiji, TKE, Fiji
Aephi got TEP, Fiji, ?