kd and adpi

as in every sorority? get your head out of your ass

I certainly wouldn't mention SDT and AZD in the same category. In my opinion, the two pledge classes AZD has gotten since I've been at UT have been, if nothing else, better looking than the ones ADPi and KD have gotten. I'd throw all three of those in about the same category with AZD slightly behind the other two, but improving steadily. they're certainly more similar to each other than they are to SDT who have something like 40 members and no house at the moment.

Yes I am a guy, and where did I mention Zeta? The only sororities I mentioned in my post were ADPi, KD, AZD, and SDT. My post had exactly nothing to do with Zeta, I don't normally post on sorority stuff, but I don't think AZD deserves to be mentioned in the same category as AZD because AZD has done well in the looks department while I've been here, and gotten solid pledge classes. Your post however is transparently written by a Zeta who's so up-in-arms that you couldn't be bothered to respond to the right post.

Same category as SDT.

Also on the below post I didn't say Zeta wasn't top tier, I said they weren't way hotter than Tri Delt and Chi O. I think overall they may be the 3 best looking sororities on campus.

the groups with the most beauties are the middle tiers

Sorry, but you must be a TriDelt or ChiO. Zeta has you both beat in the looks department BY FAR. Always has.

I didn't put Zeta along with them because Zeta usually isn't considered top tier anymore. Those may be the 3 best looking houses on campus, and I'm not saying Zeta is less attractive than DDD and XO, just that they don't tend to be considered top tier

In my opinion Zeta is not far better looking than Tri Delt and Chi O. All 3 are good looking, but in no way does Zeta blow them out of the water. Just walking around campus and seeing girls at parties I'd say Tri Delt would be my pick for hottest, but it's a close call.

ADPI not real strong in Texas but a little better at Texas lower mid tier with the Phi's

KD has closed most of their chapters in Texas which is strange because they're usually top tier in the South. ADPi is also normally top tier in the South but are just mid to lower tier in Texas, top at smaller schools. KKG and DDD are the only groups that are both top in the South AND Texas.

Almost, although XO and Zeta tend to be strong in the South as well as Texas. They may tend to be more upper middle to occasionally top tier in Texas than KKG and DDD, but both tend to be on the strong end at Texas schools just like the rest of the South. Though while KKG, DDD, XO and Zeta are all strongest in the South they tend to be strong elsewhere too. The Sororities that are regionally strong to mostly just the South like Phi Mu, KD and ADPi (to a lesser extent since they have a number of decent chapters outside the South too) don't do that well in Texas.

Ditto.

Probably depends on taste, although both are attractive. ChiO's overdo it on the makeup and tend to look a little too much like Stepford Barbies for my taste. Zeta's are very attractive, but tend to be really small. I personally prefer Tri Delts, a lot seem to be tall and athletic, but I'm sure someone else could make equally valid points for several houses. We all know what opinions are like.

Chill out, the question was answered and then the thread spun off on a tangent about how attractiveness doesn't relate to tier.

but PiPhi and Theta are so weak in the South where Greek life is most prominent. Kappa is really the only group that is usually top everwhere...but even they have their bottom tier chapters

Actually Pi Phi is usually pretty good at SEC schools, just not generally top. Theta has a couple very good SEC chapters, but more really weak ones.