aphi vs zta
by: pnmI'm an incoming freshman and already being rushed by Aphi and Zeta. What's the difference between the two? Which has the better rep?
#4 by: Poor Zeta
Read the comments under the pictures of each sorority's stereotype-look in "Sisterhood is Powerful", from Texas Monthly. It says, "Zeta Tau Alpha- Zetas do try harder. Lack of effort is not why a Zeta isn't a Pi Phi. Let no one say that the Zetas don't have a look of their own. They do. Does this girl exude satisfaction with her position in life? Does she shun heavy makeup, secure in the knowledge that she has enough going for her that she can afford a perfectly natural look? Does this woman look like a Pi Phi? To her everlasting credit, she does not, and-bless her heart for trying-she never will." I'd maybe give Zeta a rating in the top 8.
#8 by: No
I was the one pointing out that the article was from 1976 and was meant as satire. The author herself declared "the Big 6" label at that point in time. If you read the article, she doesn't even make all four years in her sorority before she quits. The label has stuck and it is stupid. Most would agree that PKT are still tops in terms of tradition and desirability by a certain group of PNMs who are following family and school tradition. However, a lot of girls don't give a hoot about Big 6 or PKT. I look at Big 6 as a tradition, not a true ranking. They get who they want for the most part, but so do AXO, APhi, and (to a certain point) DG and KD. Every AXiD or ADPi pledge isn't searching for a spot in Big 6 and are quite happy where they land too. There is plenty of sisterhood to go around. Big 6, the tradition, will always continue. It is what it is. However, the rankings of all sororities is far more fluid than most would admit. Lots more cross rushing with Big 6 and the other sororities than most would admit.
Post Reply
Before you type: Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: LOLDec 12, 2017 2:29:57 PM
That article was written in 1976! Over 40 years ago. Things do change. Additionally, I have read that article several times...it doesn't even say that.