Kappa Kappa Gamma - ΚΚΓ Sorority Ratings at USC
- Total Ratings: 569
- Overall Average:
By: notPosted:
a fave. seriously seem below average on everything. the house is kinda creepy gaudy. the girls are not the most attractive. there are houses with way nicer girls. their house doesnt seem to have much sisterhood. dont deserve much hype.
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
By: supposedPosted:
to be a good house, but the girls i'm seeing on campus arent that cute and conversations have been awkward. eek
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
By: notPosted:
impressed. so many of the girls are average to very unattractive and they seem really fake
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
By: legacyPosted:
is Kappa known for cutting legacies to Theta, DG, or Pi Phi? Sure looks like it...
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
NEW ON GREEKRANK
By: @lolPosted:
Laugh all you want. But in the meantime our fingers are crossed? and we're not calming down. Love this house.
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
By: likePosted:
Like KKG just not as much as some others
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
By: wasPosted:
not impressed, seemed vapid, not much personality, no sisterhood, some awkwardly unattractive girls that appear out of the kitchen/woodwork sometimes
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
By: noPosted:
no, no, don't think so
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
By: lolPosted:
wow "PNMs" you all need to calm down...
- Friendliness:
- Popularity:
- Classiness:
- Involvement:
- Social Life:
- Sisterhood:
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
By: factPosted:
not so sure any more . . .