trying not to be biased pt. 2

2nd tier:
Aphi: campus rep: pretty, annoying, giggly, girly. Real rep: newest of sororities so I think they're a bit insecure about they're rankings. They shouldn't be though, they are definitely an attractive sorority and put a lot of effort into their looks/events/impressions. Probably for the girls who fit the top sorority stereotype but wanted an unhoused sorority that wasn't crazy like kappa. Unhoused

Bottom Tier:
Chi O: Campus rep: awkward, quiet, cute, sisterhood. Real Rep: Idk, every Chi O I know is the sweetest and nicest girl so I imagine despite their weird rep they're just a group of girls who likes the intense sisterhood rather than the going hard every weekend and making a name of themselves. If you want to be number one in the frat's eyes, don't go Chi O, but if you want lifelong friends who aren't judgy and catty then go Chi O. Unhoused

AEPhi: Campus rep: generally considered the bottom sorority, most unattractive. Real Rep: sooo nice and sweet but really shouldn't even be considered a sorority. They don't really mix with frats, they mostly are a network for each other. The awkward/nerdy girls who you'd expect to be at stanford who are really close friends with one another. Join them if you think you're awkward/nerdy and hate going out but love making sweet friends. Unhoused

please let me know if i missed any stereotypes, I tried to be as un-biased as possible (i'm a member of one of these sorors)