true
by: Ranks
Phi Mu/Tri Delt
AOPi/DZ
KD/AXO
ADPi/Chi O
KKG/SK
DG/Pi Phi
ZTA
Commentby: NopeSep 9, 2014 1:04:38 PM
by: AndSep 9, 2014 5:25:06 PM
by: You Sep 9, 2014 5:19:35 PM
by: Uh...Sep 9, 2014 5:23:54 PM
by: WowSep 9, 2014 10:39:10 PM
Yes, ADPi had a great recruitment, but to try to say AXO had a bad one is nothing but jealousy. They had an awesome recruitment, just like they have for the last several years, which is better than ADPi can say...
- 0
- 0
by: AXOSep 10, 2014 4:50:27 AM
took girls to make quota that didn't even have their "so called" grade requirement of 3.0. I know this for a fact because some of the girls we dropped because of grades, they took. So don't come on here all high and mighty because you lowered your standards to make quota, whereas ADPI did not.
- 0
- 0
by: ItSep 10, 2014 1:07:22 PM
is lowering your standards, and no, our house sticks with the qualifications we have in place. TriDelt is a top house, but they're requirement states up front you need a 2.5. AXO on the other hand says a 3.0, so yeah, they lowered their standards to make quota. Nice try, AXO.
- 0
- 0
by: NopeSep 10, 2014 8:23:26 AM
AXO...stop. You can't seriously think you are in the same league as KD...just sop...you are embarrassing yourself. Lowering standards to meet quota is not top tier.
- 0
- 0
by: Seriously,Sep 10, 2014 10:19:01 AM
AXO, you lowered your standards to make quota. You got some great girls, but some did not have your grade requirement of a 3.0, and that's why they were dropped in the first place from other houses. Many houses aren't willing to deviate from their requirements which is a 3.0 grade point average to make quota, you obviously did.
- 0
- 0
by: LOL Sep 10, 2014 10:34:34 AM
Remember, KD has the highest grade requirement of all, therefore their standards are higher. I am sure they had to drop a lot that others ending up taking.
- 0
- 0
by: HaveSep 10, 2014 11:53:04 AM
You ever considered that AXO took those girls because they wanted them based on other things than grades? My chapter allows us to fight for girls we love that are on grades to keep them... I'm sure your house does too so to assume AXO isn't a good chapter because they took girls that have lower grades than their initial requirement is petty. A girl I loved in Go Greek with a 2.5 and no prior connections to any house went to a "top" house, so I guess that means they aren't top anymore, right? This is pathetic. AXO didn't have problems making quota and I'm sure that's not why they took girls on grades, just like every other house that took a few girls that don't meet their initial standards. That isn't lowering your standards, it's seeing past what's on paper to get to know the actual person. Grow up!
- 0
- 0
by: If Sep 10, 2014 3:42:41 PM
you put on your PAN page a GPA for qualifying for membership, you should stick with it. Houses set a minimum because pledging is very time consuming. They want to make sure their pledges can handle the rigor of college while pledging. REMEMBER, some girls who go through rush are sophomores. They have shown you what they can do, so, once again, AXO, your argument is invalid.
- 0
- 0
by: ...Sep 10, 2014 10:58:44 PM
So your argument is that sororities with a 2.5 requirement are better than a sorority with a 3.25 sorority, like AXO, because they didn't go below their requirement even though their girls have lower grades overall? That is illogical at best.
- 0
- 0
by: AXOSep 11, 2014 4:57:43 AM
took a girl I know with a 2.5. TriDelt posts that but they don't take girls with low GPA's. AXO, you can self rank all you want, but you lowered your standards to make quota. Stop trying to be something you're not. Why require a 3.25, and then take people with a 2.5? Oh, yeah, to make quota.
- 0
- 0
#7 by: this
is such a STUPID argument! If any house gives a bid to a girl that breaks their GPA requirement it's OBVIOUSLY because in their eyes, that girl is amazing and they see her as being a great asset to their chapter in other ways. in no way does that mean they "lowered their standards."
Aside from that, I agree with this ranking exactly as it is.
by: EverybodySep 11, 2014 3:43:07 PM
would...lol. I know you must be al alum because poor CHIO hasn't recruited well in years. They got a decent pledge class this year, but not better than the houses you just slammed. They just aren't as popular, sorry. I think they're awesome girls, but they aren't the house that a lot of girls want. Legacies are their big draw. That's their problem I think.
- 0
- 0
by: EverybodySep 18, 2014 3:29:28 PM
Post Reply
Before you type: Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: NopeSep 9, 2014 1:03:48 PM
helicopter. They had a good rush but have some catching up to do. Sorry.
- 0
- 0
Report