endless debate about kappa lack of diversity

@nuance. Not sure why you don't want to keep it positive on here and why you feel its ok to personally attack an individual on a topic where we need more discussion and NOT LESS (who cares why the person left their position or not as many of the points raised are solid!). You sound like all the other 'hammers' on here that bash away at the people speaking out or who have ideas or who are speaking out about what is wrong with the status quo. Our system is not healthy and while the reason for the lack of good health can be debated endlessly, I think it's a good guess to say that lack of acceptance of each other and different viewpoints on diversity are at the core of what ails us. Sad but true we all belong to private organizations that have a vested interest in maintaining the 'same old same old' on so many levels. You sound like you are a member of the 'same old same old' gang and frankly I think we need less of your type in our system as we are sinking. The 'same old same old' gang is the group that brings us endless ranking/re rankings, poor communication, zero transparency, no solutions, XO fiasco and GPhi death spiral. Kudos @nuance, we have zero to thank you for. Please just sit down.

The OP asks for answers in her first sentence then says there are no answers in her third sentence. The OP bashes the system then offers little to change it, asking other posters to offer suggestions.

OP says she would not want to be a WOC in our community. If the OP were a WOC and kept her identical "anti-greek because they are not diverse and nothing can change" attitude, she'd still be an angry young student. Her lack of positivity, not mine.

My offered suggestion was to ask: did someone who held the first chairmanship of an office of diversity and inclusion do all she could to promote it during her nine month reign? If so, what?

And if not, what was in it for her and her sorority to allow the "same old same old" to inhabit our system? Did she have difficulty dealing with some groups? Would they not change for the better? Are they changing under the guidance of the newest diversity chair?

It seemed a logical conclusion after reading one year of Cal greekrank Diversity and Inclusion postings that there had to be one main person consistently making the same type of post. These posting's had very similar grammar, syntax and ideas.

Identifying exactly how NPCs have changed over 100s of years I will leave to those interested in research. They have changed, and continue to evolve, no matter the opinion of the OP.