the truth

I do agree with this. Certain groups have digressed or improved these past few years. I think you should have called where you put KAT "lower middle" since no group at Auburn is bottom. I would move DDD from the party girl classification to the same classification as DZ, AOPI, KKG, and DG, because DDD has really worked on being more involved and diverse in recruitment the past few years. I agree that SK, GPB, AXiD all competed for the same girls this year, while DDD, ZTA, DZ, KKG, DG, and maybe AOPi were in competition, While the top and subtop as always were recruiting the same girls, and KAT got all of the remaining girls.
Overall pretty good depiction.

but I really would not put KAT at the bottom due to the strides they have made. There is not a "bad" group or a "lowest" sorority anymore to be honest. It is so difficult to even get in a sorority that it is a relief to get any of them. I will add that several sororities have truly made great bounds to the higher level if you must rate them. DZ, KKG, DDD, GBP, and ZTA had a solid backing of girls coming in and wanting them this time. The top groups have many legacies to come through, but there are so many, I was glad to see that many of ours went to many outstanding sororities outside their legacy "wants."
There are several girls who get on here and write negative things about certain groups, however I can tell you right now, if they had not received a bid from their Mom's sorority, they would have been overjoyed to have received a chance to bid any of the others! Stand up for ALL the Sororities in the Panhellenic and appreciate your school. One way of doing that is to protect all the groups from cyber stalkers and bullies/trolls. War Eagle!!

All the posts are accurate in many ways!

The sorority decides the reputation of the girl, not the other way around. If a sorority has programs in place to encourage FLP and involvement, if all of the older girls go to bible study together, if girls are required to have ither organizations, they're going to turn out very differently from a sorority that takes new members out every night. The new members don't decide the sorority, the sorority shapes the new member; any girl could go to any sorority and end up in a perfect fit.

with Compete, except move AXO into a group with AOP, DG, KKG and DZ. Good groups but AXO is not in the same circle as AGD or ADPi, yet someone keeps trying. Hey, just an opinion after all!

accurate

Agree that #5 post has right.

I don't think that's true, there are definitely sororities that are very similar and have a simar type of girl they compete over.
AZD, SK, DZ: genuine girls, like to go out a lot. They look for friendly, outgoing girls who want to have a good time.
AGD, ADP: preppy, involved, SGA types, look for high GPA's and leadership, ambitious girls, homecoming candidates, very driven
AOP, DG, KKG: girls next door, sweet, relaxed, look for genuine girls who are laidback and real
XO, AXO: a lot like the group above, only they focus more on grades and have a stronger religous influence.
KD, PM, PBP: very pulled together, go out a lot, look for pretty, outgoing girls
DDD, ZTA, GPB: very bubbly and outgoing, always pulled together, go out a lot, look for peppy, pretty girls
KAT- what's left

I'm not entirely sure why you put GPB as a "sub middle" tier group. They're a solid middle tier group and I think they have potential to be a sub-top group within the next few years if they keep recruiting like they have been. Also, ADPi is a solid top tier group in my opinion. I don't agree with your rankings at all, sorry.

In my opinion is the #5 post also.