facebook

rank predictions

by: Guest

The way things are heading:

ADPI/ZTA
DDD/AOPI/KD
DG
PIPHI
KAT/DEEPH/DZ/XO
AXO/KKG/PHIMU
GPHI/AEPHI/SK
APHI

Posted By: Guest
Post Reply Report
Page 1 of 1
#1  by: Ehhhh   
#1    

Sort of?? But not really??

By: Ehhhh
by: ReallyDec 17, 2016 1:29:52 PM

Makes sense, a lot of people think AOPI has gotten better & KD hasn't been as strong the last few recruitments (and KAT too).

By: Really
Report
#2  by: More like   
#2    

ADPI
ZTA
DDD
AOPI
KD
DG
-----
PI PHI
KAT
DEEPH
DZ
XO
AXO
-----
KKG
PHI MU
AEPHI
GPHI
SK
APHI

Personal opinion can switch a sorority up or down one but tiers are solid because there are 6 in each.

By: More like
by: HmmmDec 17, 2016 2:37:27 PM

Not bad, but I think it is good putting the similar sororities with arguable placement on the same lines, since everyone has different opinions. Also, I don't see why the tiers have to be exactly 6/6/6. Less chapters that are considered "bottom" is best for our Greek system and attracts better women across the board. Why make 1/3 chapters struggle in the bottom, our tiers have never been exactly symmetrical before. The more bottom chapters you have the more good pnms will drop out early in rush if faced with a bunch of bottom chapters as their prospects. Also, under this, solid mid mid chapters like DZ/XO, could now arguably be considered bottom mid, why is that a good thing?

By: Hmmm
Report
by: ??Dec 17, 2016 2:47:16 PM

Theres nothing wrong with being a bottom tier sorority. I'm in one. It's just that there are sororities that are "better" than you which isn't a bad thing. This is just an example but who cares if you think Kappa is a middle tier sorority? It's still in the bottom six. It's still a great sorority and the girls are all great but it's in the bottom 6. Tiers ultimately don't mean anything but it's not possible for every sorority to be "top tier"....someone has to be "bottom."

By: ??
Report
by: To ??Dec 17, 2016 3:18:03 PM

KKGs might care and pnms might care, just because you don't mind doesn't mean others don't mind. Why label more chapters as bottom for no reason other than for symmetry sake? Sure some chapters will be labelled as "bottom" no matter what, but why increase those labelled bottom? Just seems like a way to make more people feel less than. Who really wants to be called "bottom tier." It also would likely make more fraternities more hesitant to want to pair with more chapters. Why is that good? I would even argue that Phi Mu should be added to lower mid with AXO & Kappa next year IF they keep on the right track. Under the 6/6/6 model XO/DZ/AXO are the new bottom mid...idk, this just brings a bunch of chapters down without really bringing anyone else up.

By: To ??
Report
#3  by: Me   
#3    

XO below theta DZ and deeph

By: Me
#4  by: lol   
#4    

u have pi phi above theta and dz? lol

By: lol
#5  by: Literally perfect    
#5    

So good but aephi below sk

By: Literally perfect
#6  by: no   
#6    

KD is always better than tri delt and aopi is too

By: no
#7  by: Just my opinion   
#7    

For top tier, I'd switch aopi and dg for sure. For mid,I'd say more like theta(for tradition sake but they're kinda falling, sorry), then dz and pi phi, and then deeph and xo... too many mids on the asme line in this. I'd also put axo above kappa and phi mu, but all still mid.

By: Just my opinion

Post Reply

Before you type:  Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.

Nickname:
Message:

POPULAR ON GREEKRANK

Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.