sigma chi discussion

Kevin Flynn

k me

Haha...owned. See ya in a few years.

is sig chi losing thier charter? or are they only on probabtion?

A's and B's work for C's

Trying to make yourself feel better about your 2.0? First, that is rarely true. Second, the fact that it happens more often than it should in some industries is not good for this country. I assume you're a business major as that is the only field where your statement holds up to any appreciable extent. If you are a business major, you demonstrate a surprising lack of knowledge of economic theory because your statement is counter to a meritocracy, the most efficient distribution of labor. You're a fool, and EX continues to embarrass themselves on their own page.

Diplomacy. Alpha-helix. Linkage equilibrium. Metatarsal. Taylor theorem. Post-modernism. Mercantilism. Agflation. Arc elasticity.

Big words. Sigma Chi blows.

good one?

you didn't even try to argue because you knew you'd get torn to pieces.

God, you just cannot stop yourself from looking stupid. It wasn't about wealth distribution; rather, it was about labor distribution. I'm glad you at least tried to drop a big word in a rational comeback. though. I bet its embarrassing that you, a business/econ major, are getting so thoroughly embarrassed in your own subject by a computer science major. Oh , and as to why it's being discussed. One of your moron members brought it up.

It is in fact true that a lot of C students end up as the boss. Unless you are in academia then A and B students don't have any advantage over C students don't have any advantage over C students beyond the first job. A lot of C students have to work their way through school and have a better work ethic because of it. Plus leadership is a trait that many A and B students lack. If an A or B student is capable of leading others then C students will work for them, but if they don't demonstrate the ability to motivate people beyond a paycheck, they will be working for the C students who probably can.