Updated SRAT Rank using actual data
by: Math baddy
method: obtain data on sororities locally and nationally, and for each metric assigned a number between 1 and 18 to each chapter on each metric (for example, the chapter with most IG followers got a “1”, least got an “18”). Then totaled scores for each sorority. Categories ranked include, but are not limited to, grades, recruitment, IG followers, philanthropy, and cost.
result: most of the sororities are really not that different. (in alpha order by row)
DG Theta
Kappa ZTA
APhi DZ KD
AXO ADPi AOPi ChiO GPhi
TriDelt PhiMu
AXiD PhiSig
PiPhi
AEPhi
#1 by: Lmao
Please publish data. You picked the categories let’s see it lmao. Got to be in one of the not so bright srats. IG followers? That’s a category? Do some srats have crappy philanthropy? Self selecting categories isn’t objective. I see you didn’t select diversity in your categories. But if you did lots of your tops would get hit but those metrics are available.
Post Reply
Before you type: Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: Nah Jul 6, 2024 9:11:25 AM
813 and private?