Sorority rank using measurable data
by: Math baddy
method: obtain data on sororities locally and nationally, and for each metric assigned a number between 1 and 18 to each chapter on each metric (for example, the chapter with most IG followers got a “1”, least got an “18”). Then totaled scores for each sorority. Categories ranked include, but are not limited to, grades, recruitment, IG followers, philanthropy, and cost.
result: most of the sororities are really not that different. (in alpha order by row)
DG, Theta
ChiO, Kappa, KD, ZTA
APhi, DZ
AXO, ADPi, AOPi, TriDelt, GPhi, PhiMu
AXiD PhiSig
AEPhi PiPhi
#3by: Doesn’t work for Miami
Okay but that’s the whole thing. This is basically just a national ranking not Miami. It uses data which doesn’t take into consideration how the chapter functions on Miami specifically. DG only has 500 followers and a history of problems. Thats why they can’t be top ON MIAMI SPECIFICALLY. And besides that then PiPhi would be way higher. This is a BS ranking with no real data or research.
#4by: Um
This is so fake none of this makes sense. Pi Phi would be like upper mid based off these stats and so would Tridelta. Besides some sororities are crazy big in the south and practically unheard of in the North. You very clearly made this up unless you can show the CSV file you used to analyze this “data”
Post Reply
Before you type: Please do not post individual names, defaming content, or spam. Remember, cyber bullying can be considered a crime.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: Bronze
All the srats here are good tho.