ifc vs. locals
by: JackThe national fraternities can't keep relying on the fact that they are good else where. This is Baylor, not UT, not Tech, but Baylor. We have very solid local fraternities and some pretty lousy national ones.
#1 by: true
But it does not change the fact that expect for KOT....the local fraternities at Baylor suck.
Plus no one is joining SAE here because they are good at SMU...or SigEp because they are good at UT.
People join the group that most feel is like them.
And most people would admit that the national fraternities are better than the locals...with of course KOT being the only decent local.
Comment#2 by: Hahaha
OP sounds like a wuss. KOT is mediocre at best, phichi is lame across the board, and all other independents are no-names. Sorry you didn't get a bid from a real fraternity. I'm sure beta, ATO, or sigep would give you a bid. Well, maybe not sigep bc they actually act more like a normal fraternity.
by: ^Sep 8, 2014 9:51:46 AM
phi delt troll is obvious....
KOT, Kappa Sig, SAE are on a different level
ATO, Fiji, Phi Delt, SigEp, Delt, and Pi Kapp round out the second tier decent groups.
Everyone after that is not worth joining.
- 0
- 0
Post Reply
Before you type: Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: ^Sep 6, 2014 2:31:49 PM
Idk know Phi Chi is better than at least half of the national fraternities.
- 0
- 0
Report