The recruitment process is better than it used to be
by: WiseFor those pnm's who say that the recruitment process is broken, I am here to tell you why it is not. It is so much better than it used to be. Before sororities were required to make large early cuts, they could invite back many more pnm’s in the early rounds and save the large drops for later, and the pnm’s could also decide which houses they would go back to, or not. So that was the origin of the ‘mutual selection process’ you hear about because it used to be mutual selection. A pnm would pick up her invitations in the morning (real actual paper invitations) and decide which ones to accept. She could go to the maximum amount allowed per round, if she had that many, only dropping as many houses as she needed to, or she could decide to drop as many as she wanted at any round and just focus on her favorites, which were almost always the stronger recruiting houses that every other pnm also wanted. Pnm’s were encouraged not to drop more houses than necessary for each round. This is where the phrase ‘maximize your options’ comes from, meaning that a pnm should go to as many houses as possible each round and not drop more than. Sororities loved to have lots of pnm’s attending their parties because it made them look highly desired, the original meaning of ‘high return rates’. Only after the third round did the sororities finally have to get serious about dropping pnm’s and focus on limiting who they were inviting to pref and their bid lists. Meanwhile, the pnm’s would be dropping houses that actually wanted them and were seriously considering them for a bid, having no idea that they weren’t really in serious contention at the other houses. Then came pref round, and BOOM, the huge drops came, and all those pnm’s who had been carried from round to round with no real chance were finally dropped from those houses that were never seriously considering them. So many pnm’s had been led down the garden path, dropping all their other options, and now were left with nothing. Can you imagine? And even worse, pnm’s could have two houses at pref and rank them both and still not get a bid! This is because the house they ranked 1 had them on their second bid list, and the house they ranked 2 had them on their first bid list, and they were cross-cut. There was no quota addition system at the time so when a house reached quota that was it, no more bids. Pnm’s would go all the way to pref only to end up dropped and without a bid. This is why the recruitment process now, with RFM, is so much better even with its disappointments. It is so much better to be released as early as possible from houses that aren’t serious about you, for whatever reason, so you can focus on the houses where you are wanted, and know that if you go to pref and rank them you WILL get a bid. It has always been up to the sororities to decide their own memberships, and forcing them to make decisions earlier rather than lead pnm’s on, is by far the better way.
#1by: Rrr
Uark will have to begin having a cap on how many girls they allow to go through recruitment. This campus cannot sustain this growth rate with only having 11 houses. No other sorority will want to build a mansion and risk losing their reputation to stay at the bottom. The cut numbers given to the top houses is so completely unfair to the other houses making them seem so much more desirable to pnm’s that still have them on their schedule.
#2by: more houses!!!
Theta would do well. I’ve said this a million times. I’m a legacy to Theta and I was shocked that their chapter closed when I did research on their chapter. Many TX girls have a positive opinion of KAT and they also do pretty well as Mizzou. The reason why Theta didn’t do well is because of the old recruitment process described above. If Theta existed here, they would most likely be one of my top choices.
#3by: Keep it real
I also think there should be an emphasis on identifying the “tiers” as what they are. “Tier 1” houses are the ones that it will be increasing difficult to get a bid from unless you already have a connection in the the house. All those members are fighting to get girls from their hometowns in. Doesn’t make it bad, that is actually how the real world works, you have a better shot getting a job if you have someone already in the company that can vouch for you.
“Tier 2” houses knowing someone in the house will help but they definitely have room for girls with no connections.
“Tier 3” houses are filled with girls that would’ve preferred to be in a “higher tier house” but had no connections, were released from those houses, heartbroken, stuck it out and found a home within those houses. If you find yourself in this situation, you should look around and realize that there are a ton of amazing girls that are in all the houses.
I think if everyone understood that this is really what the tiers represent it would take away the negative connotation associated with it.
#4by: Cut Happens
Panhellenic wants as many girls as possible to go through Recruitment. Panhellenic will never be straightforward that you have about a Zero percent chance at getting into certain houses. 2200 girls and only 160-200 girls are going to each of those houses. It is not an equal chance at all. You must know girls in the house or have your family be involved with legacy/financial/political connections. When you look at the big picture, it is MUCH better to be cut at the start, so PNMs can have a Rush that gives them more time getting to know other houses. It's more realistic.
Post Reply
Before you type: Please do not post individual names, defaming content, or spam. Remember, cyber bullying can be considered a crime.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: Ummm
Houses “at the bottom” are fine with this process. It balances out the return numbers to parties and allows them to invite back more PNMs to see what amazing women they are. This deep original cut at “top houses” helps everyone involved.