If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
institutional problems

Poster Message:
There are a number of problems with Greek Life as an institution, as far as I’ve seen. Some are WashU specific and some are not, but I think most abolitionists feel that the people and individual members are not the issue. Greek life does have a very specific impact on campus life, and it’s mostly to do with the breakdown between sororities and fraternities. In the college tour, they will advertise WashU’s 30% participation rate Greek Life. This figure totally ignores the social reality of washu: 50% of women on campus will rush. The vast majority of those (~90%) will join an organization. While an individual sorority might be “competitive,” getting into a sorority is a near guarantee. After bid day, the economic and social pressures of adhering to greek life become a stressor. I agree that this one seems like an obvious fix, by offering more financial aid and implementing a need-blind rush process. I come from a higher income family and while I only spent $400 on dues (which a scholarship could cover), I probably spent close to a $1000 a semester trying to keep up with the spending habits of my sisters, including donations, brunches, and outfits for events. I agree that socializing at WashU is expensive, but when hanging out with my friends outside the sorority, I never felt like I HAD to brunch to get a photo as a family, or I HAD to buy an outfit to fit in. I spent hundreds on my big little baskets and they were underwhelming. I know a girl that spent thousands. This is normally the point where someone from a lower income status, who was lured in by the promise of financial aid, probably starts to realize they will be excluded from some activities (and in my opinion, some of the most meaningful activities) unless they start shelling out money. Would I feel left out if I didn’t have money? Definitely. Are these all workable issues in the Greek Life framework, or as a disaffiliated organization? I’d say absolutely. This is less an institutional problem with Greek Life and more an issue with the outrageous spending habits of WashU students. Fraternities are a completely different story. Only 20% of men end up in fraternities. Unlike sororities, they can pick and choose who they rush, and the ratio of rushees to pledges is much lower. This means a very small number of men actually end up in a frat and a lot of the recruitment is done through “knowing someone.” Unlike Panhellenic rush, the rush process is done over the semester, giving ample time for brothers to party with potential brothers (even though this is technically in violation of the rules). So who ends up in fraternities then? Mostly wealthy, white men who can bro down with strangers. Unlike sororities, which I’d say are fairly representational of the campus population, fraternities are the absolute essence of the social connections and wealth you had coming into school. So what are the institutional benefit of joining a fraternity? - Priority housing on campus. Fraternities give